Nearly four months after prosecutors in Minnesota decided in opposition to filing crook charges against JD.com founder Richard Liu, the Chinese billionaire is facing a civil lawsuit filed with the aid of the student who is currently accused of rape.
The plaintiff, Jingyao Liu, who changed into a 21-year-old undergraduate at the University of Minnesota, filed a civil lawsuit Tuesday in Hennepin County, Minnesota, against Richard Liu and the e-commerce giant at the time of the incident, JD.Comm Inc. The healthy, classified as a private harm case, is searching for big compensatory damages in addition to punitive damages.
Minnesota prosecutors stated in late December that they determined not to press prison rape charges against Richard Liu because of inadequate proof, concluding a 3-month assessment of the highly watched case. Prosecutors stated they’d issue in proving the case “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Prosecutors have said they’re now open to revisiting their December decision not to rate Richard Liu if they’re provided with “compelling extra statistics,” in step with an assertion Caixin acquired from Florin Roebig P.A., one of the law firms representing the plaintiff.

Richard Liu, forty-five, also referred to as Liu Qiangdong in Chinese, was arrested in Minneapolis on Aug. 31 after being accused of rape following a boozy dinner during a university program he was attending. He was changed into a launched tomorrow without bail and was allowed to go back to China.
According to a criticism filed Tuesday in a Hennepin County court docket, Bloomberg suggested that Jingyao Liu accused Richard Liu of raping her in her apartment after a business networking dinner with more than a dozen male Chinese executives. After police arrived at the condo to investigate, Richard Liu allegedly tried to intimidate her in an alternate recording at the officers’ body cameras, leading the plaintiff “to fear not best for her own protection but also for the protection of her family; in China.” Richard Liu, JD.com, and their lawyers have denied any wrongdoing.
“We have not yet reviewed the criticism and aren’t going to comment on pending litigation,” Richard Liu’s attorney Jill Brisbois stated in a Tuesday statement. “But based totally on the Hennepin County Attorney’s declination to rate a case against our client and our perception of his innocence, we sense strongly that this healthy is without merit and could vigorously defend in opposition to it.”
Peter Walsh, a legal professional for JD.com, stated the employer isn’t in a position to comment at the moment. However, they “will vigorously shield those meritless claims against the company.” Attorneys for Jingyao Liu, who had remained nameless till the lawsuit was filed on Tuesday, stated they would keep searching for justice within the be counted.
Haunted with the aid of horrific information, together with the rape allegation in opposition to Richard Liu, JD.com’s Nasdaq-listed shares took a nosedive last year, losing as much as 60% of their value from a January high. The Chinese tech giant’s inventory fee rebounded in the past due to December after prosecutors announced they might not document criminal expenses.





